“States Right’s” Proponents Should Lead the Fight against Federal Marijuana Prohibition

Thumbnail image for Fotolia_62904321_Subscription_Monthly_M.jpgThe Drug Enforcement Administration and U.S. Attorneys have raided Cannabis dispensaries and sent people to prison, even though they complied with State laws. According to a report released by Americans for Safe Access, the DOJ has spent nearly $80 million each year — more than $200,000 per day — cracking down on medical Cannabis. The federal government continues to classify Cannabis, a plant, as presenting the greatest danger, alongside heroin and LSD, with no currently accepted medical use.

We are a union of sovereign states which delegated only certain, limited sovereignty to a central government. The U. S. Congress prohibits Cannabis through its misuse of the Commerce clause of the Constitution. The Commerce Clause, Article 1, Section 8, Clause 3 of the Constitution, declares: Congress shall have power “to regulate commerce with foreign nations, and among the several states, and with the Indian tribes.”

Congress’ power “to regulate” commerce does not include the authority “to prohibit”. Congress does not possess the authority to ban goods merely because they cross state lines.

The Framers did not intend Congress to determine, via prohibition, what kinds of goods could move in interstate markets. They sought to take away from the states the power and ability to legislate interfering and neighborly regulations and enabled Congress to create uniform rules for trade. Their primary goal of the Commerce Clause was to facilitate trade between States.

The word ‘regulate’ means to ‘make regular’. Thus, trade between the States were to be common rules and the federal government was to only adjudicate differences, not prohibit a plant from being shipped interstate. Congress did not pass any laws to prohibit domestic interstate trade for well over a hundred years. No one at the time of the creating of the Constitution suggested that Congress could or should impose any restraints on the goods circulating in the interstate market.

If you are a believer in “State’s Rights,” Cannabis prohibition by the Federal Government is a clear overreach of federal power. The Sovereign States retain sole authority to allow Cannabis. The States retain the power to exempt cannabis from criminal sanctions, in spite of Congress’ unconstitutional ban on the plant. In order to win this issue and fully nullify, states and localities must continue to fight Federal overreach. The Department of Justice prosecuting Cannabis patients substantially interferes with each Sovereign State’s marijuana laws. We must stop the DOJ from prosecuting patients and dispensaries.

“The Justice Department is ignoring the will of the voters, defying Congress, and breaking the law…” Bill Piper, director of national affairs for the Drug Policy Alliance said. We need to rein in the DOJ, it is out of control.

To date, almost half of the States have legalized marijuana for medical purposes and some have legalized limited medical use of non-psychoactive cannabis extracts, which are often used to treat children with severe epilepsy. A few states and the District of Columbia have legalized recreational marijuana.

A 2014 CBS News poll found 86 percent of Americans believe doctors should be able to prescribe Cannabis to their patients, clearly the American public overwhelmingly supports the use of medical Cannabis. More importantly, our Constitution should be strictly construed, recognizing that the Sovereign States have police power, not the Federal Government.

DisclaimerThe information contain on this site and in this blog post (“post”) is provided for general informational purposes only, and may not reflect the current law in your jurisdiction. No information contained in this post should be construed as legal advice from The Gilbert G. Garcia Law Firm or the individual author, nor is it intended to be a substitute for legal counsel on any subject matter. No reader of this post should act or refrain from acting on the basis of any information included in, or accessible through, this Post without seeking the appropriate legal or other professional advice on the particular facts and circumstances at issue from a lawyer licensed in the recipient’s state, country or other appropriate licensing jurisdiction. Any and all communications as a results of this Post and/or this Site, is not secure nor confidential. Further, the mere initiation of any contact with The Gilbert G. Garcia Law Firm, staff, lawyer or a message on this post/site does not create an attorney–client relationship.

Gilbert Garcia has been Passionately Pursuing Justice for over 30 years and founded The Gilbert G. Garcia Law Firm in 2008. The Gilbert G. Garcia Law Firm is a boutique law firm, specializing in Criminal Defense. Gilbert represents adults and juveniles accused of a crime and who have with a felony, misdemeanor or record cleaning case. Conveniently located on the courthouse square to serve Montgomery and Walker Counties. Gilbert became Board Certified in Criminal Law by the Texas Board of Legal Specialization in 1989. The Gilbert G. Garcia Law Firm is located at 220 N. Thompson St., Suite 202, Conroe, TX 77301.  www.ggglawfirm.com

Drug Related Charges may include: Possession of Marijuana, Possession of Controlled Substance, Possession of Dangerous Drug, Manufacturing a Dangerous Drug/Controlled Substance, Delivery or Intent to Deliver Marijuana/Dangerous Drug/Controlled Substance, Possession of Drug Paraphernalia and many other drug related charges.